Long-term follow-up of redo pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung's disease: efficacy of the endorectal pull-through.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to review the authors' 25-year experience with redo pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung's disease including surgical technique and long-term outcome. METHODS From 1974 to now, over 325 patients with Hirschsprung's disease have been treated at C.S. Mott Children's Hospital. This includes 30 patients referred after an unsuccessful pull-through at another hospital and 2 patients with an unsuccessful pull-through from C.S. Mott. All redo pull-throughs (n = 19) were performed in these patients, and their clinical courses are reviewed. RESULTS Twelve patients required reoperation secondary to a mechanical problem with their first pull-through. The other 7 patients had evidence of residual segments of dilated colon leading to functional failure of their initial operation including 5 patients with documented aganglionic bowel present at the second pull-through. Ten of the patients requiring reoperation initially had an endorectal pull-through (ERPT), 5 had a Duhamel procedure, 3 had a Swenson procedure, and 1 had a Rehbein procedure. Choice of revision was an ERPT in 8 patients in whom an adequate rectal cuff could be developed. Additional redo procedures included a Duhamel in 8 patients and a Swenson in 3 patients. Follow-up ranges from 3 months to 23 years (mean, 13.8 years). There were no deaths in the series, and 1 patient required a third pull-through. All patients who are not neurologically impaired and are over age 3 are continent except one (94%). Stools per day range from 1 to 10 (mean, 3.2). CONCLUSIONS Redo pull-through operations for Hirschsprung's disease appear to be as effective as primary procedures in terms of continence and stooling frequency. Distinct from other series, we found an ERPT to be the procedure of choice if an adequate rectal cuff was present.